Relations between Architecture, Urban Planning, Environmental Engineering, and Sociology in Sustainable Urban Design in Indonesia (Literature Study)

Penulis

  • Muhammad Ade Kurnia Harahap Universitas Simalungun
  • Supriandi Supriandi Universitas Nusaputra
  • Funco Tanipu Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Abraham Manuhutu Politeknik Negeri Ambon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/jgws.v1i02.395

Kata Kunci:

Arsitektur, Perencanaan Kota, Teknik Lingkungan, Sosiologi, Desain Perkotaan Berkelanjutan

Abstrak

Studi literatur ini mengeksplorasi hubungan interdisipliner antara arsitektur, perencanaan kota, teknik lingkungan, dan sosiologi dalam desain perkotaan berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Studi ini menemukan bahwa kolaborasi interdisipliner sangat penting untuk menciptakan lingkungan perkotaan yang berkelanjutan dan layak huni, karena memastikan bahwa prinsip-prinsip desain berkelanjutan diintegrasikan ke dalam proses desain dan bahwa kebutuhan dan preferensi orang-orang yang tinggal di kota dipertimbangkan. Prinsip desain berkelanjutan, seperti efisiensi energi, pengelolaan air, pengelolaan limbah, dan penggunaan bahan ramah lingkungan, sangat penting untuk menciptakan lingkungan perkotaan yang berkelanjutan. Studi ini juga mengidentifikasi peran teknologi dalam desain perkotaan yang berkelanjutan, termasuk kemampuannya untuk meningkatkan efisiensi energi, pengelolaan air, pengelolaan limbah, dan transportasi. Selain itu, partisipasi masyarakat sangat penting untuk menciptakan rasa kepemilikan dan kebanggaan terhadap lingkungan perkotaan. Studi ini mengidentifikasi beberapa tantangan dan peluang untuk hubungan interdisipliner antara disiplin ilmu ini dalam desain perkotaan berkelanjutan di Indonesia, termasuk kurangnya koordinasi antara berbagai disiplin ilmu yang terlibat dan kurangnya sumber daya dan pendanaan untuk proyek desain perkotaan berkelanjutan. Secara keseluruhan, studi ini menyoroti pentingnya kolaborasi interdisipliner, prinsip-prinsip desain berkelanjutan, teknologi, dan partisipasi masyarakat dalam menciptakan lingkungan perkotaan yang berkelanjutan dan layak huni di Indonesia. Penelitian lebih lanjut harus fokus pada pengembangan model yang efektif untuk kolaborasi interdisipliner, mengidentifikasi strategi yang efektif untuk menerapkan prinsip-prinsip desain berkelanjutan, dan mengeksplorasi peran teknologi dan partisipasi masyarakat dalam desain perkotaan yang berkelanjutan.

Referensi

Abbott, J. (2013). Sharing the city: community participation in urban management. routledge.

Ahammed, F. (2017). A review of water-sensitive urban design technologies and practices for sustainable stormwater management. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 3, 269–282.

Akpinar, I., Gülersoy, N. Z., Koramaz, K., Ozsoy, A., & Gurler, E. E. (2016). The Making of an Urban Designer in the ambiguous global context: an interdisciplinary graduate education at ITU. International Planning History Society Proceedings, 17(7), 21–34.

Alzamil, W. S. (2018). Evaluating urban status of informal settlements in Indonesia: A comparative analysis of three case studies in North Jakarta. Journal of Sustainable Development, 11(4), 148.

Anthony Swaim, J., Maloni, M. J., Henley, A., & Campbell, S. (2016). Motivational influences on supply manager environmental sustainability behavior. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(3), 305–320.

Bibri, S. E., Krogstie, J., & Kärrholm, M. (2020). Compact city planning and development: Emerging practices and strategies for achieving the goals of sustainability. Developments in the Built Environment, 4, 100021.

Breed, C. A., Cilliers, S. S., & Fisher, R. C. (2015). Role of landscape designers in promoting a balanced approach to green infrastructure. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(3), A5014003.

Burmeister, P., & van de Weg, D. (2018). How sustainable urban design can reduce infrastructure costs. Civil Engineering= Siviele Ingenieurswese, 2018(7), 6–9.

Butt, A. N., & Dimitrijević, B. (2022). Multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary collaboration in nature-based design of sustainable architecture and urbanism. Sustainability, 14(16), 10339.

Cai, Y. (2020). Exploring the Potentials of Interdisciplinary Studios in the University of Washington College of Built Environments. University of Washington.

Coates, G. J. (2013). The sustainable urban district of Vauban in Freiburg, Germany. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 8(4), 265–286.

Colléony, A., & Shwartz, A. (2019). Beyond assuming co-benefits in nature-based solutions: A human-centered approach to optimize social and ecological outcomes for advancing sustainable urban planning. Sustainability, 11(18), 4924.

Dameri, R. P., & Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (2014). Smart city: How to create public and economic value with high technology in urban space. Springer.

Dias, N., Curwell, S., & Bichard, E. (2014). The current approach of urban design, its implications for sustainable urban development. Procedia Economics and Finance, 18, 497–504.

Douglas, O., Lennon, M., & Scott, M. (2017). Green space benefits for health and well-being: A life-course approach for urban planning, design and management. Cities, 66, 53–62.

El-Bana, N., Selim, S. E., & Taleb, H. (2015). Optimising sustainability at an urban level: a case study of Dubai Sustainable City. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 193, 985–995.

Endangsih, T. (2020). Evaluation of environmental performance using the green city index in Depok City, Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1625(1), 12001.

Farr, D. (2011). Sustainable urbanism: Urban design with nature. John Wiley & Sons.

Fields, N., Cronley, C., Hyun, K., Mattingly, S. P., Miller, V. J., Nargesi, R., Khademi, S., Nahar, S., Williams, J., & Murphy, E. (2019). How can interdisciplinary teams leverage emerging technologies to respond to transportation infrastructure needs? A mixed-methods evaluation of civil engineers, urban planning, and social workers’ perspectives. National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC).

Goubran, S., & Cucuzzella, C. (2019). Integrating the sustainable development goals in building projects. Journal of Sustainability Research, 1(e190010), 1–43.

Gündel, H. (2018). Low carbon neighborhood: Walking and cycling priority urban design. Izmir Institute of Technology (Turkey).

Hatuka, T., Rosen-Zvi, I., Birnhack, M., Toch, E., & Zur, H. (2018). The political premises of contemporary urban concepts: The global city, the sustainable city, the resilient city, the creative city, and the smart city. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 160–179.

Ibrahim, M., Al-Nasrawi, S., El-Zaart, A., & Adams, C. (2015). Challenges facing e-government and smart sustainable city: An Arab region perspective. 15th European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 396–402.

Ivanova, Z., & Yudenkova, O. V. (2015). Sociological methods for sustainable urban design. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 737, 909–912.

Kirmanto, D., Ernawi, I. S., & Djakapermana, R. D. (2012). Indonesia green city development program: An urban reform. 48th ISOCARP Congress, 4.

Kotzen, B. (2018). Economic benefits and costs of green streets. In Nature Based Strategies for Urban and Building Sustainability (pp. 319–331). Elsevier.

Lin, J., & Mele, C. (2012). The urban sociology reader. Routledge.

López, I., Ortega, J., & Pardo, M. (2020). Mobility infrastructures in cities and climate change: an analysis through the superblocks in Barcelona. Atmosphere, 11(4), 410.

Medved, P., Kim, J. I., & Ursic, M. (2020). The urban social sustainability paradigm in Northeast Asia and Europe A comparative study of sustainable urban areas from South Korea, China, Germany and Sweden. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 8(4), 16–37.

Meijer, M., Adriaens, F., van der Linden, O., & Schik, W. (2011). A next step for sustainable urban design in the Netherlands. Cities, 28(6), 536–544.

Mihelcic, J. R., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2021). Environmental engineering: Fundamentals, sustainability, design. John wiley & sons.

Moosavi, S., & Bush, J. (2021). Embedding sustainability in interdisciplinary pedagogy for planning and design studios. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 0739456X211003639.

Nóblega Carriquiry, A., Sauri, D., & March, H. (2020). Community involvement in the implementation of sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDSs): The case of Bon Pastor, Barcelona. Sustainability, 12(2), 510.

Nugroho, S., & Zhang, J. (2022). Explorations of Young People’s Sense of Place Using Urban Design Qualities in Surabaya, Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(1), 472.

Palència, L., León-Gómez, B. B., Bartoll, X., Carrere, J., Díez, E., Font-Ribera, L., Gómez, A., López, M. J., Marí-Dell’Olmo, M., & Mehdipanah, R. (2020). Study protocol for the evaluation of the health effects of Superblocks in Barcelona: the “Salut Als Carrers”(Health in the Streets) project. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 2956.

Permana, A. S., Astuti, W., & Er, E. (2017). Waterfront Development Concepts in Indonesia from the Perspective of Urban Planning and Environmental Sustainability. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 4(3).

Piana, M. R., Aronson, M. F. J., Pickett, S. T. A., & Handel, S. N. (2019). Plants in the city: understanding recruitment dynamics in urban landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(8), 455–463.

Portschy, S. (2016). Community participation in sustainable urban growth, case study of Almere, the Netherlands. Pollack Periodica, 11(1), 145–155.

Ramezani, H., & Reza, E. (2022). The Consequence of Combining Indigenous Techniques with a Flexible Design to Reduce Energy Consumption in Residential Buildings for Future Architecture. Sustainability, 14(21), 13958.

Repko, A. F. (2009). Transforming an experimental innovation into a sustainable academic program at the University of Texas–Arlington. The Politics of Interdisciplinary Studies: Essays on Transformations in American Undergraduate Programs, 144–162.

Ritchie, A., & Thomas, R. (2013). Sustainable urban design: an environmental approach. Taylor & Francis.

Rueda, S. (2019). Superblocks for the design of new cities and renovation of existing ones: Barcelona’s case. Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning: A Framework, 135–153.

Sallis, J. F., Bull, F., Burdett, R., Frank, L. D., Griffiths, P., Giles-Corti, B., & Stevenson, M. (2016). Use of science to guide city planning policy and practice: how to achieve healthy and sustainable future cities. The Lancet, 388(10062), 2936–2947.

Shahid, M., Rana, I. A., Jamshed, A., Najam, F. A., Ali, A., & Aslam, A. (2022). Quantifying the role of social capital for enhancing urban resilience against climate crisis: Empirical evidence from formal and informal settlements of Pakistan. Cities, 130, 103851.

Shen, W., Hao, Q., Mak, H., Neelamkavil, J., Xie, H., Dickinson, J., Thomas, R., Pardasani, A., & Xue, H. (2010). Systems integration and collaboration in architecture, engineering, construction, and facilities management: A review. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 24(2), 196–207.

Tortajada, C., Joshi, Y. K., & Biswas, A. K. (2013). The Singapore water story: Sustainable development in an urban city-state. Routledge.

van Nes, A. (2021). Spatial configurations and walkability potentials. Measuring urban compactness with space syntax. Sustainability, 13(11), 5785.

Wang, J. (2021). Understanding Carsharing-Facilitating Neighborhood Preferences.

Wiryasa, N. M. A., & Dwijendra, N. K. A. (2021). Socio-physical transformation towards sustainable urban morphology through land readjustment in Indonesia. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(3), 874–882.

Wiryomartono, B. (2012). The politics of development in Indonesia: The aesthetic culture and power play in architecture and urban design. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 16(2), 203–223.

Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough.’ Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244.

Yamu, C., Van Nes, A., & Garau, C. (2021). Bill Hillier’s legacy: Space syntax—A synopsis of basic concepts, measures, and empirical application. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3394. s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published ….

Yang, J., Yang, L., & Ma, H. (2022). Community participation strategy for sustainable urban regeneration in Xiamen, China. Land, 11(5), 600.

Zain, A. F. M., Pribadi, D. O., & Indraprahasta, G. S. (2022). Revisiting the Green City concept in the tropical and Global South cities context: The case of Indonesia. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 45.

Zografos, C., Klause, K. A., Connolly, J. J. T., & Anguelovski, I. (2020). The everyday politics of urban transformational adaptation: Struggles for authority and the Barcelona superblock project. Cities, 99, 102613.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2023-06-30

Cara Mengutip

Harahap, M. A. K., Supriandi, S., Tanipu, F., & Manuhutu, A. (2023). Relations between Architecture, Urban Planning, Environmental Engineering, and Sociology in Sustainable Urban Design in Indonesia (Literature Study). Jurnal Geosains West Science, 1(02), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.58812/jgws.v1i02.395